Hume's Philosophy
I find David Hume’s philosophy
absolutely intriguing. He was a Scottish philosopher and empiricist who
believed that "Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the
passions.” Unlike Descartes and the rationalists before him, he believed that
desire rather than reason governs human behavior and examined moral philosophy
and free will within that context. He also believed that innate ideas do not
exist, arguing that before humans can have impressions of the world, they must
first directly experience them and learn from them, akin to the "tabula rasa"
philosophy of Locke. For this reason, he felt that in scientific reasoning, we
have to be careful about the things we include because they are biased by our
perceptions. Our morality and ethics are based on feelings rather than abstract
principles inherent in nature. Finally, he noted that we develop our scientific
reasoning about the phenomena around us by noting the “constant conjunction” of
causes and effects that occur, all based on the proximity of two events
occurring in time. I think that this does indeed shed light on how we observe
phenomenon in the world and form theories about why and how they occur. We do
need to be careful about observing phenomenon in a controlled setting so that
we rule out third variables as being the cause for something. Our passions do
cause us to see the things we are looking for in the world and do color our
perceptions of the things we experience. I look forward to learning more about
his thoughts!
Thanks for fully explaining his philosophy, it is interesting how he examines the role of passion in determining our impressions of the world and our scientific reasoning. A lot of philosophers seem to be debating the idea of what is Truth, and whether or not it is relative or absolute, after reading your blog post I wonder what his "stance" would have been.
ReplyDelete